Funding

Funding Services

Green Jobs - Lab Research :: Lab Testing

Phase

Beta

Audience

We were focusing on

Primary questions

What we discovered

Does the Application Journey have any major issues
💡It is not obvious that it is SAVING as you go. (Do you have to submit each section or does it save each field)
Fair Work is not well understood by customers.
- It feels like an absolute barrier to some
- It is not understood WHY we are asking for it
Put all the things that would disqualify a user Up Front (Or make it feel that way)
RETAIL on the banned list is too ambiguous.
Green Jobs is not just about Jobs (a bit…)
How long will it take users?
A bit too long. It started to wear down people about mid way.
Fair Work was the breaking point for some
How hard will they find it (Evidence etc…)
It is quite straight forward but they might flag a bit toward the middle
A bit repetitive
None of it seems unnecessary BUT there is a lot of it.
Smaller companies would be put off. Larger companies probably get it.

🎧 Quotes

Quote
“It isn’t very well explained (Service Description)
“I could read this page and easily apply this” (Service Description)
“I would have been off making a cup of tea by now” (About your project)
“None of it seems unnecessary - there’s just a lot of it”
“I would be starting to zone out and think nah, this isn’t for me” (Fair Work section)
“This is getting a bit like a riddle” (Impact of funding section)
“That wall of words is off-putting. I’d prefer to see it broken down a wee bit” (dyslexic)
“Overall that’s quite a straightforward application”
“It feels like there is a massive gap there” (Eligibility Response)
“I would leave the website at this point, and go make a plan based on this page” and then come back with my Word Doc (About your Project)
“I have completed my Eligibility and I have no idea if I am eligible?”

2021_05_11_FUND_Green_Jobs_Playback.pdf